Rebuilt three legacy systems into one modular knowledge base, with 5 interfaces shipped at 270+ data centers.

Rebuilt three legacy systems into one modular knowledge base, with 5 interfaces shipped at 270+ data centers.

Role

Lead Designer

Timeline

Oct 2022 - Apr 2024

Core team

Role

Lead Designer

Timeline

Oct 2022 - Apr 2024

Core team

Sal Sidani
Jung-Soo Choi
Katarzyna Młynarczyk
Srivats Ravichandran
Problem

Three systems held parts of the answer. No system held the whole.

Three systems held parts of the answer. No system held the whole.

Equinix operates 270+ data centers (IBX, for International Business Exchange) across 34 countries. The teams running them depended on three internal systems for site information: Data Center Master, Compliance Certification, and the Emergency Contact List. Each was built independently, owned by different teams, and structured differently.
None held a complete view. Routine pre-sales and operational queries required manual outreach to site teams because information was inconsistently stored across all three systems.
Takeaway
The systems worked in isolation. The space between them needed to become the product.
Problem

Three systems held parts of the answer. No system held the whole.

Equinix operates 270+ data centers (IBX, for International Business Exchange) across 34 countries. The teams running them depended on three internal systems for site information: Data Center Master, Compliance Certification, and the Emergency Contact List. Each was built independently, owned by different teams, and structured differently.
None held a complete view. Routine pre-sales and operational queries required manual outreach to site teams because information was inconsistently stored across all three systems.
Takeaway
The systems worked in isolation. The space between them needed to become the product.
Approach

One system, built progressively, replaced three.

One system, built progressively, replaced three.

I led end-to-end design as the sole designer on the project. John Britti, working in the IBX product domain, was my design counterpart and sounding board.
The work was a 0→1 greenfield build, not a migration. Three legacy systems would be decommissioned, EquiMaps would be integrated as the spatial layer, and one knowledge base would become the surface for site information.
Rather than designing the full product and shipping it once, I released each interface progressively over 39 sprints, testing with real users between releases and refining the next build based on what we learned. The discipline let the product reach 270+ sites in production use.
Takeaway
The work wasn't building five screens. It was building a system that could keep being built.
Data Center Master
Compliance Certification
Emergency Contact List
EquiMaps
Data Center Knowledge Base
Approach

One system, built progressively, replaced three.

I led end-to-end design as the sole designer on the project. John Britti, working in the IBX product domain, was my design counterpart and sounding board.
The work was a 0→1 greenfield build, not a migration. Three legacy systems would be decommissioned, EquiMaps would be integrated as the spatial layer, and one knowledge base would become the surface for site information.
Rather than designing the full product and shipping it once, I released each interface progressively over 39 sprints, testing with real users between releases and refining the next build based on what we learned. The discipline let the product reach 270+ sites in production use.
Takeaway
The work wasn't building five screens. It was building a system that could keep being built.
Data Center Master
Compliance Certification
Emergency Contact List
EquiMaps
Data Center
Knowledge Base
Challenge

Unifying inconsistent data into a single surface that users could trust.

Each of the three systems had its own naming conventions, data structure, and level of metadata reliability. Much of the content was redundant or outdated, and ownership of what was canonical wasn't always clear.
A simple migration would have preserved the inconsistency inside a cleaner interface. The problem was building a surface users could trust, and designing interactions that held up whether a site's data was complete or partial.
Takeaway
The hard part wasn't the data. It was designing trust into a system that had to surface imperfect data honestly.
Challenge

Unifying inconsistent data into a single surface that users could trust.

Each of the three systems had its own naming conventions, data structure, and level of metadata reliability. Much of the content was redundant or outdated, and ownership of what was canonical wasn't always clear.
A simple migration would have preserved the inconsistency inside a cleaner interface. The problem was building a surface users could trust, and designing interactions that held up whether a site's data was complete or partial.
Takeaway
The hard part wasn't the data. It was designing trust into a system that had to surface imperfect data honestly.
Design

Five targeted design interventions. Each decision made imperfect data usable at a global scale.

Five targeted design interventions. Each decision made imperfect data usable at a global scale.

Design

Five targeted design interventions. Each decision made imperfect data usable at a global scale.

Intervention 1

Designed mobile-first because the tool had to work outside the desk.

The Knowledge Base served sales teams, operations, compliance, and site teams working across offices, meetings, and on-site environments. None of those contexts was desk-first. The legacy systems were. Designing mobile-first forced every decision through the lens of the smallest surface area first. Content hierarchy had to hold before any screen was wide enough to hide it.

Intervention 2

Built the information hierarchy around who needed what, and when.

The system had to surface certifications, emergency protocols, and hundreds of site attributes without overwhelming users. Ted Yang and Shagun Kakkar brought the operational and systems context: which users needed which information, and in what sequence. I structured the hierarchy around those scenarios, prioritizing attributes by frequency of access, task criticality, and role.

Intervention 3

Designed search and filtering around task flow, not data taxonomy.

With the hierarchy in place, search and filtering became the primary means of accessing information. Predictive search with plain-language metadata reduced the gap between how users described information and how it was stored. Filters surfaced contextually based on the task.

Intervention 4

Structured the system as independent modules so it could keep shipping.

The Knowledge Base was designed as five independent modules: Landing Page, Details, Floor Plan, Contacts, and Certifications. Each had its own workflows and release cycle. Modules could be updated and scaled independently. The 39-sprint rollout was possible because the architecture was built to support it.

Intervention 5

Integrated spatial data into the knowledge base as a native layer.

The Floor Plan module integrated EquiMaps, Equinix's internal spatial platform. I designed the interaction around spatial hierarchy: building → floor → room → asset. Physical infrastructure became a navigable layer of the product, not a detour out of it.

Impact

One knowledge base replaced three systems across 270+ data centers.

One knowledge base replaced three systems across 270+ data centers.

By April 2024, the Knowledge Base had replaced Data Center Master, Compliance Certification, and the Emergency Contact List across all 270+ Equinix data centers. EquiMaps was integrated as the spatial layer. Five modular interfaces were in daily use by sales, operations, compliance, and site teams.
Across 39 sprints of release–review cycles, users consistently reported that locating site information was faster than on the legacy tools, and that manual data requests to site teams had reduced. These were qualitative patterns, not instrumented measurements.
In February 2024, Tom Langer, VP of Global Operations Enablement at Equinix, wrote to the project team:

This is simply the best version of the IBX Knowledge Base yet. The interface and UI design have come together nicely (and the mobile prototype looks great). A lot of work across many teams has gotten us to this point. Great job by the entire team. BTW: I plan to show off the latest version at the Global Operations Leadership Team (GOLT) staff meeting next week.

Tom Langer

Vice President, Global Operations Enablement · Equinix

This is simply the best version of the IBX Knowledge Base yet. The interface and UI design have come together nicely (and the mobile prototype looks great). A lot of work across many teams has gotten us to this point. Great job by the entire team. BTW: I plan to show off the latest version at the Global Operations Leadership Team (GOLT) staff meeting next week.

Tom Langer

Vice President, Global Operations Enablement · Equinix
Takeaway
The Knowledge Base became the go-to surface for site information. Imperfect data, made trustworthy at a global scale.
Impact

One knowledge base replaced three systems across 270+ data centers.

By April 2024, the Knowledge Base had replaced Data Center Master, Compliance Certification, and the Emergency Contact List across all 270+ Equinix data centers. EquiMaps was integrated as the spatial layer. Five modular interfaces were in daily use by sales, operations, compliance, and site teams.
Across 39 sprints of release–review cycles, users consistently reported that locating site information was faster than on the legacy tools, and that manual data requests to site teams had reduced. These were qualitative patterns, not instrumented measurements.
In February 2024, Tom Langer, VP of Global Operations Enablement at Equinix, wrote to the project team:

This is simply the best version of the IBX Knowledge Base yet. The interface and UI design have come together nicely (and the mobile prototype looks great). A lot of work across many teams has gotten us to this point. Great job by the entire team. BTW: I plan to show off the latest version at the Global Operations Leadership Team (GOLT) staff meeting next week.

Tom Langer

Vice President, Global Operations Enablement · Equinix
Takeaway
The Knowledge Base became the go-to surface for site information. Imperfect data, made trustworthy at a global scale.
Learning

Designing for imperfect data means designing for trust.

Designing for imperfect data means designing for trust.

The challenge wasn't organizing good data. It was making uneven data usable in a way people could rely on. The system's credibility came from the interface being clear about what it knew and what it didn't.
The work didn't rely on a single research study. It relied on 39 sprints of progressive release, with real users inside the system between each one. That cadence was the validation.
The modular architecture made the system easier to extend, test, and refine over time. It's what allowed the product to absorb continuous feedback and stay coherent across releases.
Learning

Designing for imperfect data means designing for trust.

The challenge wasn't organizing good data. It was making uneven data usable in a way people could rely on. The system's credibility came from the interface being clear about what it knew and what it didn't.
The work didn't rely on a single research study. It relied on 39 sprints of progressive release, with real users inside the system between each one. That cadence was the validation.
The modular architecture made the system easier to extend, test, and refine over time. It's what allowed the product to absorb continuous feedback and stay coherent across releases.
Endorsement
Endorsement

An excellent co-worker and an excellent designer. I've seen her handle the complexities of enterprise design with alacrity, always able to coax out workable user needs from vague stakeholder demands. I was always impressed with her professionalism with stakeholders; she knows how to be calm and clear with difficult personalities, compromising where appropriate, but keeping a strong backbone when the user's needs or the right design needed defending.

John Britti

Sr. UX Designer · Equinix

An excellent co-worker and an excellent designer. I've seen her handle the complexities of enterprise design with alacrity, always able to coax out workable user needs from vague stakeholder demands. I was always impressed with her professionalism with stakeholders; she knows how to be calm and clear with difficult personalities, compromising where appropriate, but keeping a strong backbone when the user's needs or the right design needed defending.

John Britti

Sr. UX Designer · Equinix

Intelligent Customer Engagement

Founding designer at the Series A startup, shaping the AI-powered platform and design system 0→1.

Intelligent Customer Engagement

Founding designer at the Series A startup, shaping the AI-powered platform and design system 0→1.